2019 ASTRO Annual Meeting

Abstract Scoring Criteria

Abstracts will be scored by blind peer review based on the following criteria:

  • Does the abstract address an important and novel question?
  • Does the study design permit the question to be answered?
  • Are the endpoints of the study clearly defined?
  • Is there an appropriate use of statistics?
  • Are the methods described in sufficient detail?
  • Are the conclusions supported by the data?

Specific questions for prospective clinical trials:

  • What were the scientific hypothesis and primary endpoint?
  • What were the eligibility criteria and study patient characteristics?
  • What statistical model and assumptions were used?
  • What was the toxicity assessment?
  • What were the limitations?
  • Was there a rationale, either clinical or laboratory, underlying the study design? 
  • Is it either promising enough to pursue or negative enough that presentation would prevent other investigators from wasting efforts? 

Specific questions for retrospective observational studies:

  • What are the scientific hypothesis and outcomes reported?
  • What is the data source and how was follow-up attained?
  • Is the cohort well described and reasonably homogeneous? 
  • Have attempts been made to account for biases inherent in retrospective reviews?
  • What statistical methods were used?
  • Are the conclusions appropriate to the study design?

We have recently updated our privacy policy and terms of use.
By using this site, you agree to ASTRO’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
We use cookies to provide, secure and improve our services to you. To learn more, click here.